[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15081617#comment-15081617
]
Vladimir Rodionov commented on HBASE-14030:
-------------------------------------------
[~mbertozzi]
{quote}
I just started looking at the code, but my first question is:
why are we using java Properties and Serializable Object instead of protobuf?
{quote}
Any reason why we should use protobuf? Java serialization is much simpler,
performance is not the issue, these are system (not-public) objects.
> HBase Backup/Restore Phase 1
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-14030
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14030
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Umbrella
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Vladimir Rodionov
> Assignee: Vladimir Rodionov
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-14030-v0.patch, HBASE-14030-v1.patch,
> HBASE-14030-v10.patch, HBASE-14030-v11.patch, HBASE-14030-v12.patch,
> HBASE-14030-v13.patch, HBASE-14030-v14.patch, HBASE-14030-v15.patch,
> HBASE-14030-v17.patch, HBASE-14030-v18.patch, HBASE-14030-v2.patch,
> HBASE-14030-v20.patch, HBASE-14030-v21.patch, HBASE-14030-v22.patch,
> HBASE-14030-v23.patch, HBASE-14030-v24.patch, HBASE-14030-v25.patch,
> HBASE-14030-v26.patch, HBASE-14030-v3.patch, HBASE-14030-v4.patch,
> HBASE-14030-v5.patch, HBASE-14030-v6.patch, HBASE-14030-v7.patch,
> HBASE-14030-v8.patch
>
>
> This is the umbrella ticket for Backup/Restore Phase 1. See HBASE-7912 design
> doc for the phase description.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)