[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15206909#comment-15206909
]
Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-15389:
---------------------------------------
bq. So let's set the fix version to 1.4.0? Then we have plenty of time for
testing.
The base patch went to 1.3.0, and Mikhail agreed to have these in 1.3. If the
patches are ready and tested to some extent we can commit these to 1.3 as well
I think.
bq. Can we couple the release of HBASE-15389 and HBASE-15400? I am porting this
to our branch to test in production this week
[~clarax98007] do you want the patches to be committed together? This patch by
itself is not used without HBASE-15400, so it can go in I think.
[~Apache9], I'm +1 on the master patch if hadoopqa came back positive. There
has been a couple of runs above, but for branch-1 or 0.98 patch I think. Did we
get a run for the latest master patch?
> Write out multiple files when compaction
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-15389
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15389
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Compaction
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 0.98.19, 1.4.0
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
> Assignee: Duo Zhang
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 0.98.19, 1.4.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-15389-0.98.patch, HBASE-15389-0.98.v1.patch,
> HBASE-15389-branch-1.patch, HBASE-15389-uc.patch, HBASE-15389-v1.patch,
> HBASE-15389-v10.patch, HBASE-15389-v11.patch, HBASE-15389-v12.patch,
> HBASE-15389-v13.patch, HBASE-15389-v2.patch, HBASE-15389-v3.patch,
> HBASE-15389-v4.patch, HBASE-15389-v5.patch, HBASE-15389-v6.patch,
> HBASE-15389-v7.patch, HBASE-15389-v8.patch, HBASE-15389-v9.patch,
> HBASE-15389.patch
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
