[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15466227#comment-15466227
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16445:
-----------------------------------
The sync implementation is based on the async implementation. The
{{callBlockingMethod}} just uses a {{BlockingRpcCallback}} to call
{{callMethod}}.
And I added the locking comment on top of AbstractRpcClient. Let me add some
comments for the netty implementation.
{quote}
This means resuable?
{quote}
Yes, reusable.
> Refactor and reimplement RpcClient
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-16445
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16445
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
> Assignee: Duo Zhang
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16445-v1.patch, HBASE-16445-v2.patch,
> HBASE-16445-v3.patch, HBASE-16445-v4.patch, HBASE-16445.patch
>
>
> There are lots of common logics between RpcClientImpl and AsyncRpcClient. We
> should have much less code comparing to the current implementations.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
