[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15466722#comment-15466722
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16445:
-----------------------------------
In the new patch, I renamed the RpcClientImpl to BlockingRpcClient and
AsyncRpcClient to NettyRpcClient to better describe the actual implementation.
Added a deprecated name mapping in RpcClientFactory to map the old name to new
name.
> Refactor and reimplement RpcClient
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-16445
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16445
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
> Assignee: Duo Zhang
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16445-v1.patch, HBASE-16445-v2.patch,
> HBASE-16445-v3.patch, HBASE-16445-v4.patch, HBASE-16445-v5.patch,
> HBASE-16445.patch
>
>
> There are lots of common logics between RpcClientImpl and AsyncRpcClient. We
> should have much less code comparing to the current implementations.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
