[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15466279#comment-15466279
]
Yu Li commented on HBASE-16445:
-------------------------------
Oops, sorry, I was talking about the old codes... I could see much better
handling in the patch, but still, in {{AsyncConnection#connect}} should we also
pass in the Call instance and call {{Call#setException}} on failure? Thanks.
> Refactor and reimplement RpcClient
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-16445
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16445
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
> Assignee: Duo Zhang
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16445-v1.patch, HBASE-16445-v2.patch,
> HBASE-16445-v3.patch, HBASE-16445-v4.patch, HBASE-16445.patch
>
>
> There are lots of common logics between RpcClientImpl and AsyncRpcClient. We
> should have much less code comparing to the current implementations.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
