[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16157272#comment-16157272
]
Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-18753:
----------------------------------------
bq, Segment needs Sync version of TR where as Immutable Segments can have
Simple version
Will address it as a follow up
bq. Why name this way? NON_SYNC? That is not correct name?
Will replace it by ASYNC (thanks! Ted)
bq. This can make a non sync version of TR right?
ya, no one use it in multi-threading env. Will change it from SYNC to ASYNC.
Thanks. [~anoop.hbase]
> Introduce the unsynchronized TimeRangeTracker
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18753
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18753
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Chia-Ping Tsai
> Assignee: Chia-Ping Tsai
> Fix For: 2.0.0-alpha-3
>
> Attachments: HBASE-18753.v0.patch
>
>
> If HBASE-18752 is pushed, it will be better to introduce the unsync
> TimeRangeTracker for reducing the cost of recalculation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
