[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16157800#comment-16157800
]
stack commented on HBASE-18753:
-------------------------------
bq. Will replace it by ASYNC
ASYNC is incorrect. See definitions. We are talking about synchronized access
vs non-synchronized access; not some deferred operation with callback, etc.
The patch looks good. The enums on create are a little awkward. Will there ever
be more than two modes?
> Introduce the unsynchronized TimeRangeTracker
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18753
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18753
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Chia-Ping Tsai
> Assignee: Chia-Ping Tsai
> Fix For: 2.0.0-alpha-3
>
> Attachments: HBASE-18753.v0.patch, HBASE-18753.v1.patch
>
>
> If HBASE-18752 is pushed, it will be better to introduce the unsync
> TimeRangeTracker for reducing the cost of recalculation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
