[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16221712#comment-16221712
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-18995:
------------------------------------------------
[~appy] and [~saint....@gmail.com]
Thanks for your comments on RB. I have replied to most of your comments. Let me
know what you think. Patch wise nothing much to change except for renaming to
InternalCellUtil to privateCellUtil. I am fine with any of these two names. I
first named it as PrivatecellUtil but since already @PRivate tag was there I
thought InternalCellUtil is better.
> Move methods that are for internal usage from CellUtil to Private util class
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18995
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18995
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha-3
> Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0-alpha-4
>
> Attachments: HBASE-18995-branch-2.patch,
> HBASE-18995-branch-2_1.patch, HBASE-18995-branch-2_1.patch,
> HBASE-18995-branch-2_1.patch, HBASE-18995-branch-2_1.patch
>
>
> This was brought up long time back. We need to move some of the public APIs
> from CellUtil to internal private Util class because they are used in some
> internal flow and does not make sense to have it in a @public exposed Util
> class.
> The topic again came in HBASE-18945 RB comments also.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
