[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16258836#comment-16258836
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-19301:
-------------------------------

bq. he only disadvantage will be that it will NOT be a short circuit enabled 
connection.

A Connection accessing local Server will short-circuit (To be verified).

But perhaps you are referring to difference between an invocation that goes via 
protobuf service but skips the rpc invocation vs a direct invocation, one that 
skips doing protobuf marshalling/unmarshaling AND rpc?

If this is what you mean, can we make it so there is only one short-circuit 
type -- the direct-invocation -- everywhere? I've not looked. Perhaps you have? 
i.e. do what the Phoenix 'short-circuit' used do but native inside hbase when 
it notices it an invocation against a local server?

Thanks [~anoop.hbase]

> Provide way for CPs to create short circuited connection with custom 
> configurations
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-19301
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19301
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Coprocessors
>            Reporter: Anoop Sam John
>            Assignee: Anoop Sam John
>             Fix For: 2.0.0-beta-1
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-19301.patch
>
>
> Over in HBASE-18359 we have discussions for this.
> Right now HBase provide getConnection() in RegionCPEnv, MasterCPEnv etc. But 
> this returns a pre created connection (per server).  This uses the configs at 
> hbase-site.xml at that server. 
> Phoenix needs creating connection in CP with some custom configs. Having this 
> custom changes in hbase-site.xml is harmful as that will affect all 
> connections been created at that server.
> This issue is for providing an overloaded getConnection(Configuration) API



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to