[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16296174#comment-16296174
]
stack commented on HBASE-10092:
-------------------------------
bq. My take would be doing it overtime.
I agree (we need to evangelize content of
https://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#logging_performance).
I like your list Appy.
Adding Marker of FATAL won't get us anything unless logback is the backend.
[~jvz] Thanks for the help. We're punting on log4j2. There's been no progress
on log4j2 reading log4j1 property files and the platform we run on top of,
hadoop, went slf4j on us.
> Move up on to log4j2
> --------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-10092
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10092
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: stack
> Assignee: Balazs Meszaros
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0-beta-1
>
> Attachments: 10092.txt, 10092v2.txt, HBASE-10092-preview-v0.patch,
> HBASE-10092.master.001.patch, HBASE-10092.master.002.patch, HBASE-10092.patch
>
>
> Allows logging with less friction. See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/
> This rather radical transition can be done w/ minor change given they have an
> adapter for apache's logging, the one we use. They also have and adapter for
> slf4j so we likely can remove at least some of the 4 versions of this module
> our dependencies make use of.
> I made a start in attached patch but am currently stuck in maven dependency
> resolve hell courtesy of our slf4j. Fixing will take some concentration and
> a good net connection, an item I currently lack. Other TODOs are that will
> need to fix our little log level setting jsp page -- will likely have to undo
> our use of hadoop's tool here -- and the config system changes a little.
> I will return to this project soon. Will bring numbers.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
