[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13211190#comment-13211190
 ] 

Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-5241:
--------------------------------------

What about the fact the currently Deletes and Puts are idempotent? With this 
change a failed Put or Delete cannot just be redone, because the effect might 
be different.
                
> Deletes should not mask Puts that come after it.
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-5241
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5241
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Amitanand Aiyer
>            Assignee: Amitanand Aiyer
>         Attachments: HBASE-5241.D1731.1.patch, HBASE-5241.D1731.2.patch, 
> HBASE-5241.D1731.3.patch
>
>
> Suppose that we have a delete row, and then followed by the put. The delete 
> row
> can mask the put, unless there was a major compaction in between.
> Now that we are flushing the memstoreTS to disk, along with the KVs, we 
> should be able
> to differentiate whether or not the Put happened after the Delete and offer 
> better 
> delete semantics.
> Couldn't find a pre-existing JIRA that already discusses this, so creating 
> one.
> Seems related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2406, but is not 
> quite the same.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to