[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16487635#comment-16487635
 ] 

Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-20478:
-------------------------------------

bq. Ugh, that's a lot of failures. Need to do more digging to figure out if 
checkstyle added a bunch of new rules, or maybe we just weren't checking things 
properly?

Last night's nightly for master:

bq. -0  checkstyle      2m 29s  root: The source tree has 15866 issues.

https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/342/General_Nightly_Build_Report/

> move import checks from hbaseanti to checkstyle
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-20478
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20478
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: test
>            Reporter: Sean Busbey
>            Assignee: Mike Drob
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: HBASE-20478.0.patch, HBASE-20478.1.patch, 
> HBASE-20478.2.patch, HBASE-20478.3.patch, HBASE-20478.4.patch, 
> HBASE-20478.WIP.2.patch, HBASE-20478.WIP.2.patch, HBASE-20478.WIP.patch, 
> HBASE-anti-check.patch
>
>
> came up in discussion on HBASE-20332. our check of "don't do this" things in 
> the codebase doesn't log the specifics of complaints anywhere, which forces 
> those who want to follow up to reverse engineer the check.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to