[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16765138#comment-16765138
]
Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-21748:
-------------------------------------
aren't those measurements on HBase 2* though?
I was referring to [~apurtell]'s comment here:
bq. However I don't think branch-1 has the same exposure to the perf problem.
I'm not sure how to demonstrate a benefit. I will try some simple benchmarking
but may need to resort to JMH to quantify it to any degree of certainty.
> Port HBASE-21738 (Remove all the CLSM#size operation in our memstore because
> it's an quite time consuming.) to branch-1
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-21748
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21748
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Andrew Purtell
> Assignee: Andrew Purtell
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.5.0, 1.4.10, 1.3.4
>
> Attachments: HBASE-21748-branch-1.patch, HBASE-21748-branch-1.patch
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
