[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16977882#comment-16977882
]
Michael Stack commented on HBASE-23279:
---------------------------------------
On patch, this
n -> DataBlockEncoding.valueOf(n.toUpperCase()),
DataBlockEncoding.ROW_INDEX_V1);
should be...
n -> DataBlockEncoding.valueOf(n.toUpperCase()), DataBlockEncoding.
DEFAULT_DATA_BLOCK_ENCODING); ?
Same here...
return setValue(DATA_BLOCK_ENCODING_BYTES, type == null ?
812 DataBlockEncoding.ROW_INDEX_V1.name() : type.name());
Same here...
private DataBlockEncoding encoding = DataBlockEncoding.ROW_INDEX_V1;
... and so on .
> Switch default block encoding to ROW_INDEX_V1
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-23279
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23279
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Wish
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0, 2.3.0
> Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
> Assignee: Viraj Jasani
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.3.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-23279.master.000.patch,
> HBASE-23279.master.001.patch
>
>
> Currently we set both block encoding and compression to NONE.
> ROW_INDEX_V1 has many advantages and (almost) no disadvantages (the hfiles
> are slightly larger about 3% or so). I think that would a better default than
> NONE.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
