[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17249134#comment-17249134
]
Michael Stack commented on HBASE-24850:
---------------------------------------
I thought BBKV was default in branch-2? Sounds like its not? Talking offline w/
Ram, we only have 'contiguous' implementations of Cell currently so comparator
for now should just presume it? When different implementation (do we have an
issue for discussing this?), then we can worry about changing the comparator?
> CellComparator perf improvement
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-24850
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24850
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Performance, scan
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Anoop Sam John
> Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-1, 2.5.0
>
>
> We have multiple perf issues in 2.x versions compared to 1.x. Eg:
> HBASE-24754, HBASE-24637.
> The pattern is clear that where ever we do more and more Cell compares, there
> is some degrade. In HBASE-24754, with an old KVComparator style comparator,
> we see much better perf for the PutSortReducer. (Again the gain is huge
> because of large number of compare ops that test is doing). This issue is to
> address and optimize compares generally in CellComparatorImpl itself.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
