[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13288429#comment-13288429
]
Jonathan Hsieh commented on HBASE-6055:
---------------------------------------
I agreee that HDFS-3370, and HDFS-233 are likely a ways off. Hardlinks would
probably obviate the need for HBASE-5547. We could probably take advantage of
HDFS symlinks HDFS-245 which is in Hadoop 2.x.x hdfs but may not be in Hadoop
1.x.x hdfs.
I think that HBASE-5547 is a prereq for either consistency approach (even if we
use symlinks) until we have hdfs hardlinks. I'll take a closer look into
HBASE-5547.
> Snapshots in HBase 0.96
> -----------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-6055
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6055
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: client, master, regionserver, zookeeper
> Reporter: Jesse Yates
> Assignee: Jesse Yates
> Fix For: 0.96.0
>
> Attachments: Snapshots in HBase.docx
>
>
> Continuation of HBASE-50 for the current trunk. Since the implementation has
> drastically changed, opening as a new ticket.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
