[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13537695#comment-13537695
]
stack commented on HBASE-7405:
------------------------------
bq. The thing we get is user code deals with PB only.
That sounds right (Yeah, decision was made after original implementation).
Makes sense.
bq. Yeah, true. I did it this way just to have the same signature for all
methods. I think this makes it look better than the alternative..
I'd say depends. See what the javadoc says. On one hand its good to be
regular. On other hand, user will be trying to figure what to do w/ the extra
unused generics thinking they must be for something -- though in their case
they do not need them.
> Enforce PB ser/de for Aggregate protocol and associated ColumnInterpreter
> user code bits
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-7405
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7405
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Coprocessors, Protobufs
> Reporter: Devaraj Das
> Assignee: Devaraj Das
> Fix For: 0.96.0
>
> Attachments: 7405-1.patch, 7405-2.patch
>
>
> Enforce PB ser/de for Aggregate protocol and associated ColumnInterpreter
> user code bits
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
