[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13566915#comment-13566915
]
Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-3787:
--------------------------------------
This is a bit orthogonal, but we need a nounce-like mechanism for client ->
master RPC's as well. Currently most of the master operations are semi-async,
meaning that they initiate a task (disable table), but have no way of asking
the master later, about the status of the request. This is different than using
RPC callId, because the RPC call itself finishes, but not the side effect of
the operation.
> Increment is non-idempotent but client retries RPC
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-3787
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3787
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Client
> Affects Versions: 0.96.0, 0.94.4
> Reporter: dhruba borthakur
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.96.0
>
>
> The HTable.increment() operation is non-idempotent. The client retries the
> increment RPC a few times (as specified by configuration) before throwing an
> error to the application. This makes it possible that the same increment call
> be applied twice at the server.
> For increment operations, is it better to use
> HConnectionManager.getRegionServerWithoutRetries()? Another option would be
> to enhance the IPC module to make the RPC server correctly identify if the
> RPC is a retry attempt and handle accordingly.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
