[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13678821#comment-13678821
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-8496:
---------------------------------------
{quote}
bq. Is putting tags after value a good idea?
Oops, So you mean that tags needs to be part of the KV comparisions itself. Was
thinking that would be a major change. So we need to sort KVs based on tags
also?
{quote}
I would strongly caution against this. Tags will be _arbitrary_ metadata and
won't have anything to do with locating the value itself.
On the other hand, some use cases may want it, see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6222?focusedCommentId=13396190&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13396190
I don't have a good answer for resolving this conflict.
We may just want to live with the constraints imposed by not having tags be
part of the key. This would significantly simplify implementation.
> Implement tags and the internals of how a tag should look like
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-8496
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8496
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Fix For: 0.98.0
>
>
> The intent of this JIRA comes from HBASE-7897.
> This would help us to decide on the structure and format of how the tags
> should look like.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
