rdblue commented on a change in pull request #4102:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/4102#discussion_r805404589
##########
File path: aws/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/aws/glue/DynamoLockManager.java
##########
@@ -60,8 +60,9 @@
import
software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.TransactionConflictException;
/**
- * DynamoDB implementation for the lock manager.
+ * @deprecated will be removed in 0.15.0, please use {@link
org.apache.iceberg.aws.dynamodb.DynamoDbLockManager}
*/
+@Deprecated
class DynamoLockManager extends LockManagers.BaseLockManager {
Review comment:
Why deprecate this if it wasn't public in the first place?
Also, can this extend `DynamoDbLockManager` so that we don't have two
implementations? Then we can also get rid of the tests here.
##########
File path: aws/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/aws/glue/DynamoLockManager.java
##########
@@ -60,8 +60,9 @@
import
software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.TransactionConflictException;
/**
- * DynamoDB implementation for the lock manager.
+ * @deprecated will be removed in 0.15.0, please use {@link
org.apache.iceberg.aws.dynamodb.DynamoDbLockManager}
*/
+@Deprecated
class DynamoLockManager extends LockManagers.BaseLockManager {
Review comment:
If this is already effectively public because people use it dynamically
as their lock-impl, then I'd probably keep this instead of renaming. Or maybe
have both names, but definitely not remove this unless it's absolutely
necessary.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
