rdblue commented on PR #5195: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/5195#issuecomment-1181899491
Thanks, @shidayang! I think this is a good idea for cases where the delete filter is reused. In Spark, this shouldn't affect how long deletes are held in memory because both the filter iterator and the filter are held by the reader. Since there's no negative effect, but there's a very positive effect if this is reused, I think it's a good idea. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
