rmannibucau commented on a change in pull request #65:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/pull/65#discussion_r457409869



##########
File path: 
maven-resolver-impl/src/main/java/org/eclipse/aether/internal/impl/DefaultSyncContextFactory.java
##########
@@ -28,31 +30,59 @@
 import org.eclipse.aether.artifact.Artifact;
 import org.eclipse.aether.impl.SyncContextFactory;
 import org.eclipse.aether.metadata.Metadata;
+import org.slf4j.Logger;
+import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
+
+import com.google.inject.Singleton;
 
 /**
- * A factory to create synchronization contexts. This default implementation 
actually does not provide any real
- * synchronization but merely completes the repository system.
+ * A factory to create synchronization contexts. This default implementation 
uses fair global locking
+ * based on {@link ReentrantReadWriteLock}. Explicit artifacts and metadata 
passed are ignored.
  */
 @Named
+@Singleton
 public class DefaultSyncContextFactory
     implements SyncContextFactory
 {
+    private final ReentrantReadWriteLock lock = new ReentrantReadWriteLock( 
true );
 
     public SyncContext newInstance( RepositorySystemSession session, boolean 
shared )
     {
-        return new DefaultSyncContext();
+        return new DefaultSyncContext( shared ? lock.readLock() : 
lock.writeLock(), shared );
     }
 
     static class DefaultSyncContext
         implements SyncContext
     {
+        private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger( 
DefaultSyncContext.class );
+
+        private final Lock lock;
+        private final boolean shared;
+        private int lockHoldCount;
+
+        DefaultSyncContext( Lock lock, boolean shared )
+        {
+            this.lock = lock;
+            this.shared = shared;
+        }
 
         public void acquire( Collection<? extends Artifact> artifact, 
Collection<? extends Metadata> metadata )
         {
+            LOGGER.trace( "Acquiring global {} lock (currently held: {})",
+                          shared ? "read" : "write", lockHoldCount );
+            lock.lock();
+            lockHoldCount++;
         }
 
         public void close()

Review comment:
       Since I proposed to not return void but actual locks (to handle errors) 
then close() would be useless




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to