arkadius commented on pull request #4773: URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4773#issuecomment-810896312
> Could you please give us some examples of formats that can be problematic? I've tested this change on about ~40 flows and find out 3 formats that were incompatible and need change: - `yyyy-mm-dd HH:mm:ss` -> `yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss` (don't ask me how it used to work with `SimpleDateFormat` :) - `yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSX` -> `yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSXXX` - `dd/MMM/yyyy:HH:mm:ss` with input: `28/Jan/2021:14:58:00 +0100` -> `dd/MMM/yyyy:HH:mm:ss X` > though I did not use really advanced formats Yes, it looks like it were mainly some advanced usages of formatting zone > it is questionable to add this change in a minor release I think that putting this change in minor release is not a good idea. Even if it breaks compatibility only in those advanced cases, I would be surprised if it will be introduced in minor release. Do we have some other approach for changes for next major realse? Should I rebase it to some other branch than `main`? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
