dan-s1 commented on PR #6689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/6689#issuecomment-1363956081

   > Thanks for working on this new feature @dan-s1. Although most of the 
implementation makes sense, it raises some questions about treating blanks 
strings as nulls. Although the `java.net.URI` has a number of constructors, it 
seems like this may provide more options than necessary. There is some value in 
simplicity, versus exposing all the possible options, which could also avoid 
potential confusion related to handling blank strings as nulls.
   > 
   > The discussion on NIFI-10754 originated out of issues with the `urlEncode` 
function. If the implementation were to be scoped down to just something like 
`uriEncodePath`, for instance, would that provide the desired functionality?
   
   @exceptionfactory  If I understand you correctly that means there would have 
to be potentially two calls when constructing a URI, one to urlEncodePath and 
one to urlEncode to encode the parameters. I was actually intending to simplify 
that process of URI construction with one call which would take care of the 
encoding for both the path and the parameters.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@nifi.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to