[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16268931#comment-16268931
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on MINIFICPP-303:
------------------------------------------

Github user phrocker commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/185
  
    CMake Error at 
/usr/local/Cellar/cmake/3.10.0/share/cmake/Modules/WriteBasicConfigVersionFile.cmake:40
 (message):
      No VERSION specified for WRITE_BASIC_CONFIG_VERSION_FILE()
    Call Stack (most recent call first):
      
/usr/local/Cellar/cmake/3.10.0/share/cmake/Modules/CMakePackageConfigHelpers.cmake:207
 (write_basic_config_version_file)
      CMakeLists.txt:644 (write_basic_package_version_file)
    
    I don't see this in a rocksdb 5.8 clean checkout. I'm on OSX. 


> Upgrade civetweb and rocksdb
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: MINIFICPP-303
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-303
>             Project: NiFi MiNiFi C++
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Caleb Johnson
>
> These upgrades to the latest stable releases of civetweb 
> ([v1.10|https://github.com/civetweb/civetweb/releases/tag/v1.10]) and RocksDB 
> ([v5.8|https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/releases/tag/v5.8]) bring numerous 
> improvements. They might solve any issues similar to those in MINIFICPP-262.
> For civet, the most notable is OpenSSL v1.1 support. It was partially 
> backported to the version in the minifi tree (1.9.1), but still had issues 
> matching some OpenSSL v1.1 interface changes. Civetweb release v1.10 has 
> complete and official support.
> RocksDB v5.8 comes with the following bugfixes:
> * Fix wrong latencies in rocksdb.db.get.micros, rocksdb.db.write.micros, and 
> rocksdb.sst.read.micros.
> * Fix incorrect dropping of deletions during intra-L0 compaction.
> * Fix transient reappearance of keys covered by range deletions when memtable 
> prefix bloom filter is enabled.
> * Fix potentially wrong file smallest key when range deletions separated by 
> snapshot are written together.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to