https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124210
--- Comment #26 from Sam Jennings <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Andre from comment #25) > @Sam: Looks like you took care of defining the new behavior, all three > points are good ideas. Thanks! I suspect (1) and (3) are the best candidates, because if resizing upwards can move text beneath the table it's not going to be a reversible action if the user moves the top edge upwards again. The logical reversal of (1) for a downsize is to insert (eoln) blank lines of text. The drawback is a blank line has a fixed size, and the user might want to be more precise than that. On the other hand, the logical reversal of (3) could be a very literal inverse action of upsizing... that being reducing the size of the table and its top row, but moving the bottom table edge upwards. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
