https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124210
--- Comment #27 from Sam Jennings <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Sam Jennings from comment #26) > (In reply to Andre from comment #25) > > @Sam: Looks like you took care of defining the new behavior, all three > > points are good ideas. > > Thanks! > > I suspect (1) and (3) are the best candidates, because if resizing upwards > can move text beneath the table it's not going to be a reversible action if > the user moves the top edge upwards again. > > The logical reversal of (1) for a downsize is to insert (eoln) blank lines > of text. The drawback is a blank line has a fixed size, and the user might > want to be more precise than that. > > On the other hand, the logical reversal of (3) could be a very literal > inverse action of upsizing... that being reducing the size of the table and > its top row, but moving the bottom table edge upwards. Sorry, correction: > the user moves the top edge upwards again. Should be: "the user moves the top edge downwards again." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
