https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=3959
--- Comment #325 from j_s_dussault <[email protected]> --- (In reply to ther from comment #322) > > It would be better to develop the long-term strategy of a superior function. > The m$-clone fans assume everyone has access to and is able to use m$word > and simply copy the functionality into lo/oo. > > It's apparent that this function requires signficant work, requiring > professional project management and user specification. It's very strange > that authors with supposedly superior communication skills are unable to > collaborative and produce a definitive specification of _superior_ functions > for programmers to develop. We have this ancient request and an equivalent > in LO. Which program should this function be written for, first? I can't help to notice that you propose to do have superior functions than MS' Word, but fail yourself to produce a specification of these. Coming up with something superior is a great concept, but people usually don't come up with new ideas if needs are filled by the existing model. In any case, not having suggestions for the « next outline evolution » is not a reason to not implement the functionality when people are saying they would really work with the existing model. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue. You are the assignee for the issue.
