rabbah commented on a change in pull request #5169:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/5169#discussion_r759650231



##########
File path: 
common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/ActivationStore.scala
##########
@@ -35,21 +35,25 @@ case class UserContext(user: Identity, request: HttpRequest 
= HttpRequest())
 trait ActivationStore {
 
   protected val disableStoreResultConfig = 
loadConfigOrThrow[Boolean](ConfigKeys.disableStoreResult)
+  protected val disableStoreNonBlockingResultConfig = 
loadConfigOrThrow[Boolean](ConfigKeys.disableStoreNonBlockingResult)
   protected val unstoredLogsEnabledConfig = 
loadConfigOrThrow[Boolean](ConfigKeys.unstoredLogsEnabled)
 
   /**
    * Checks if an activation should be stored in database and stores it.
    *
    * @param activation activation to store
    * @param isBlockingActivation is activation blocking
+   * @param disableBlockingStore do not store activation if successful and 
blocking
+   * @param disableNonBlockingStore do not store activation if successful and 
non-blocking

Review comment:
       I think there are two orthogonal issues - one is configuration and 
making that backward compatible. The other is the internal interface and 
implementation. 
   
   I think the distinctions you want to make suggests this alternate/simpler 
enum:
   
   - `STORE_ALWAYS` (default)
   - `STORE_ON_FAILURE`
   - `STORE_NON_BLOCKING`
   
   From a configuration point of view, you can continue to accept the current 
configuration property (perhaps with a deprecation warning) and introduce a new 
configuration that maps to the enum. It would be an error to specify both 
configurations properties.
   
   




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to