adoroszlai commented on a change in pull request #1667:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/1667#discussion_r543061256
##########
File path: hadoop-ozone/dist/src/shell/ozone/start-ozone.sh
##########
@@ -64,68 +63,53 @@ if [[ $# -ge 1 ]]; then
dataStartOpt="$startOpt"
;;
*)
- hadoop_exit_with_usage 1
+ ozone_exit_with_usage 1
;;
esac
fi
#Add other possible options
nameStartOpt="$nameStartOpt $*"
-SECURITY_ENABLED=$("${HADOOP_HDFS_HOME}/bin/ozone" getconf -confKey
hadoop.security.authentication | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' 2>&-)
-SECURITY_AUTHORIZATION_ENABLED=$("${HADOOP_HDFS_HOME}/bin/ozone" getconf
-confKey hadoop.security.authorization | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' 2>&-)
-
-#if [[ ${SECURITY_ENABLED} == "kerberos" || ${SECURITY_AUTHORIZATION_ENABLED}
-# == "true" ]]; then
-# echo "Ozone is not supported in a security enabled cluster."
-# exit 1
-#fi
-
-#SECURITY_ENABLED=$("${HADOOP_HDFS_HOME}/bin/ozone" getozoneconf -confKey
hadoop.security.authentication | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' 2>&-)
-#SECURITY_AUTHORIZATION_ENABLED=$("${HADOOP_HDFS_HOME}/bin/ozone" getozoneconf
-confKey hadoop.security.authorization | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' 2>&-)
-#if [[ ${SECURITY_ENABLED} == "kerberos" || ${SECURITY_AUTHORIZATION_ENABLED}
== "true" ]]; then
-# echo "Ozone is not supported in a security enabled cluster."
-# exit 1
-#fi
+SECURITY_ENABLED=$("${OZONE_HOME}/bin/ozone" getconf -confKey
hadoop.security.authentication | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' 2>&-)
+SECURITY_AUTHORIZATION_ENABLED=$("${OZONE_HOME}/bin/ozone" getconf -confKey
hadoop.security.authorization | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' 2>&-)
# datanodes (using default workers file)
echo "Starting datanodes"
-hadoop_uservar_su hdfs datanode "${HADOOP_HDFS_HOME}/bin/ozone" \
+ozone_uservar_su hdfs datanode "${OZONE_HOME}/bin/ozone" \
--workers \
- --config "${HADOOP_CONF_DIR}" \
+ --config "${OZONE_CONFIG_DIR}" \
--daemon start \
datanode ${dataStartOpt}
-(( HADOOP_JUMBO_RETCOUNTER=HADOOP_JUMBO_RETCOUNTER + $? ))
+OZONE_JUMBO_RETCOUNTER=$?
Review comment:
Yes, this is intentional, please see item 4 in PR description:
> it was incremented for the first and third commands and unconditionally
set for the second one, so the result of the first command was lost. It should
be set for the first one instead.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
