errose28 commented on PR #7682: URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/7682#issuecomment-2588486457
I actually prefer `--dry-run` and the default to be doing the repair. The user has already entered `ozone repair` and acknowledged the warning prompt, so after all this not doing the repair seems counter-intuitive. Not to mention the repetitiveness of `ozone repair ... --repair` just to make the command do what was intended. FSO repair was originally made before there as a dedicated `ozone repair` command with its own safeguards in place hence dry run was the default in that implementation, but we have a better framework in place now. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
