[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17683149#comment-17683149
]
Ethan Rose commented on HDDS-7577:
----------------------------------
{quote}this PR only supports owner persistence, it does not change the logic of
ACLs
{quote}
Makes sense, thanks for clarifying.
{quote}How will this work for s3 multi-tenancy, where the s3 access ID and user
name will be different?
{quote}
Since we are writing a default owner, we just need to make a choice here as to
whether the default owner is the access ID or kerberos principal. I would say
to use access ID in this case, since we can get the kerberos principal from the
access ID but not the other way around. [~smeng] do you have any thoughts here?
> Add Key owner field
> -------------------
>
> Key: HDDS-7577
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7577
> Project: Apache Ozone
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Ozone Manager
> Reporter: ChenXi
> Assignee: ChenXi
> Priority: Major
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NwnfxPQCUwP-CV8RjerKeuR3puFiOsxjKBxP8rE6P2k/edit?usp=sharing
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
