[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17683580#comment-17683580
]
Ethan Rose commented on HDDS-7577:
----------------------------------
bq. Is there a case where the user name wouldn't suffice?
The doc attached to the jira looks to support displaying object owner to s3
clients. In this case they would want the access ID displayed. If we store user
name we cannot return the access ID, however if we store access ID we could
still do the conversion to user name for acl checks.
> Add Key owner field
> -------------------
>
> Key: HDDS-7577
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7577
> Project: Apache Ozone
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Ozone Manager
> Reporter: ChenXi
> Assignee: ChenXi
> Priority: Major
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NwnfxPQCUwP-CV8RjerKeuR3puFiOsxjKBxP8rE6P2k/edit?usp=sharing
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]