[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17765547#comment-17765547
]
Sammi Chen commented on HDDS-7728:
----------------------------------
Hi [~sodonnell], [~erose], I'm not sure if we are thinking the same case,
could you explain a little bit more about what the orphan block and orphan
container situations mentioned, and how is it related with the current proposal
that if there are 4 replicas of a over replicated container, which one is a
better candidate to delete? So that we can on the same page and continue the
discussion.
I understand that RM is a module with a lot of complexity. But Recon also
become more and more complex now. Is it possible for Recon to make a better
decision than RM without knowing all the information which are easy to get by
RM? I'm kind of doubt that.
> Block should be safely deleted from the containers if they are instructed
> from OM and containers are in missing state.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDDS-7728
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7728
> Project: Apache Ozone
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: SCM
> Affects Versions: 1.3.0
> Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G
> Assignee: Ashish Kumar
> Priority: Major
>
> Currently when OM instructs to delete the blocks and if containers are in
> missing state, deletion may not be processed properly. This Jira to track
> this requirement and implement to safe deletion os blocks what ever state
> they are on. Otherwise containers would never get cleaned up even though all
> blocks in that files deleted.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
