ivandika3 commented on PR #6458: URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/6458#issuecomment-2044968632
@adoroszlai @errose28 I have a question regarding S3A in general. In what case does using S3A protocol more beneficial rather than using the OFS protocol? My understanding is that S3A aims to provide HDFS semantic to non hadoop-compatible storage (like using S3Guard when AWS S3 was still eventually consistent), whereas Ozone already provides OFS as a direct implementation of HDFS filesystem. From the performance point of view, it seems using s3a adds more network overhead since the s3a client needs to connect to S3G, and the S3G connect to OM whereas OFS will directly connect to OM. Thanks in advance. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
