[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16684397#comment-16684397
 ] 

Daniel Wong commented on PHOENIX-4845:
--------------------------------------

I briefly surveyed some large code bases for their approaches and found these 2 
which are nice and limits the need for cursor style syntax which I think is 
good for a first pass.  The burden on the user is not a key then it is a 
offset.  Decoupling from the key (much like cursor) provides most of the 
benefit that I was looking for in my discussion of a less column based query.

MySQL, [https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/select.html]
{code:java}
SELECT * FROM tbl LIMIT 5,10; # Retrieve rows 6-15
{code}
And Oracle, https://docs.oracle.com/javadb/10.8.3.0/ref/rrefsqljoffsetfetch.html


{code:java}
SELECT val FROM rownum_order_test ORDER BY val OFFSET 4 ROWS FETCH NEXT 4 ROWS 
ONLY;
{code}
Both of these i feel fit well and could be used.

> Support using Row Value Constructors in OFFSET clause to support paging in 
> tables where the sort order of PK columns varies
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-4845
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4845
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Thomas D'Silva
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: DESC, SFDC
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-offset.txt
>
>
> RVCs along with the LIMIT clause are useful for efficiently paging through 
> rows (see [http://phoenix.apache.org/paged.html]). This works well if the pk 
> columns are sorted ascending, we can always use the > operator to query for 
> the next batch of row. 
> However if the PK of a table is (A  DESC, B DESC) we cannot use the following 
> query to page through the data
> {code:java}
> SELECT * FROM TABLE WHERE (A, B) > (?, ?) ORDER BY A DESC, B DESC LIMIT 20
> {code}
> Since the rows are sorted by A desc and then by B descending we need change 
> the comparison order
> {code:java}
> SELECT * FROM TABLE WHERE (A, B) < (?, ?) ORDER BY A DESC, B DESC LIMIT 20
> {code}
> If the PK of a table contains columns with mixed sort order for eg (A  DESC, 
> B) then we cannot use RVC to page through data. 
> If we supported using RVCs in the offset clause we could use the offset to 
> set the start row of the scan. Clients would not have to have logic to 
> determine the comparison operator. This would also support paging through 
> data for tables where the PK columns are sorted in mixed order. 
> {code:java}
> SELECT * FROM TABLE ORDER BY A DESC, B LIMIT 20 OFFSET (?,?)
> {code}
> We would only allow using the offset if the rows are ordered by the sort 
> order of the PK columns.
>  
> FYI [~jfernando_sfdc]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to