eric-maynard commented on code in PR #1147:
URL: https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1147#discussion_r1988148364
##########
polaris-core/src/main/java/org/apache/polaris/core/entity/PolarisPrivilege.java:
##########
@@ -41,22 +41,22 @@ public enum PolarisPrivilege {
TABLE_CREATE(6, PolarisEntityType.NAMESPACE),
VIEW_CREATE(7, PolarisEntityType.NAMESPACE),
NAMESPACE_DROP(8, PolarisEntityType.NAMESPACE),
- TABLE_DROP(9, PolarisEntityType.TABLE_LIKE, PolarisEntitySubType.TABLE),
- VIEW_DROP(10, PolarisEntityType.TABLE_LIKE, PolarisEntitySubType.VIEW),
+ TABLE_DROP(9, PolarisEntityType.ICEBERG_TABLE_LIKE,
PolarisEntitySubType.TABLE),
Review Comment:
The authn happens at a higher level, such as
[here](https://github.com/apache/polaris/blob/02f9d208168492a828726b70b88027be878a8c43/service/common/src/main/java/org/apache/polaris/service/catalog/PolarisCatalogHandlerWrapper.java#L578)
-- so I think with a different entity, we should still be able to enforce the
existing permissions model.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
