adnanhemani commented on PR #1523:
URL: https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1523#issuecomment-2892474008

   I agree with the analysis you've stated too. I think it really comes down to 
point 1) that you made - and if someone has context as to whether they 
considered this approach before putting the TODO from point 2) down (and if so, 
why).
   
   I, personally, don't think that the semantics between Transactional and 
Atomic forces us to make a different implementation here tbh - but would also 
like any other insight from the community here :)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@polaris.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to