[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17176220#comment-17176220
]
runzhiwang edited comment on RATIS-967 at 8/12/20, 11:17 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
bq. s1 and s2 must wait for s3 to reply vote request until timeout since they
know that s3 has a higher priority.
[~szetszwo] Yes, but if s3's log lag behind s1 or s2's, s3 will reply grantVote
to s1 or s2, then s3 will not be elected as a leader.
Maybe it will cause vote complicated, but the income may not be so good.
was (Author: yjxxtd):
bq. s1 and s2 must wait for s3 to reply vote request until timeout since they
know that s3 has a higher priority.
[~szetszwo] Yes, but if s3's log lag behind s1 or s2's, s3 will reply grantVote
to s1 or s2, then s3 will not be elected as a leader.
My consideration is it will cause vote complicated, but the income may not be
so good.
> Support priority when elect leader
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: RATIS-967
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-967
> Project: Ratis
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: raft-group
> Affects Versions: 0.5.0
> Reporter: maobaolong
> Assignee: runzhiwang
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
