[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17344144#comment-17344144
]
Christine Poerschke commented on SOLR-14920:
--------------------------------------------
bq. ... Maybe we could start with just ... leaving aside ... Just an idea to
get some middle ground.
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/126 tries out starting with "nothing" and
https://github.com/cpoerschke/solr/commit/6d7722103af4c144ade51bebdf31e86e69c36c8c
is example of how "something" could be added incrementally.
What do you think?
> Format code automatically and enforce it in Solr
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-14920
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14920
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Erick Erickson
> Priority: Major
> Labels: codestyle, formatting
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> See the discussion at: LUCENE-9564.
> This is a placeholder for the present, I'm reluctant to do this to the Solr
> code base until after:
> * we have some Solr-specific consensus
> * we have some clue what this means for the reference impl.
> Reconciling the reference impl will be difficult enough without a zillion
> format changes to add to the confusion.
> So my proposal is
> 1> do this.
> 2> Postpone this until after the reference impl is merged.
> 3> do this in one single commit for reasons like being able to conveniently
> have this separated out from git blame.
> Assigning to myself so it doesn't get lost, but anyone who wants to take it
> over please feel free.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
