[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-7210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14609040#comment-14609040
 ] 

Feynman Liang commented on SPARK-7210:
--------------------------------------

[~josephkb] can you clarify whether this issue is for computing covariance 
inverse (which is currently private in MultivariateGaussian), or for computing 
the Multivariate Gaussian PDF (potentially skipping the intermediate 
representation as a precision matrix)? 

[~shivaram] do you mind explaining why QR => SVD would be more stable? I am not 
too familiar with this. Thanks.

> Test matrix decompositions for speed vs. numerical stability for Gaussians
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-7210
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-7210
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: MLlib
>            Reporter: Joseph K. Bradley
>            Priority: Minor
>
> We currently use SVD for inverting the Gaussian's covariance matrix and 
> computing the determinant.  SVD is numerically stable but slow.  We could 
> experiment with Cholesky, etc. to figure out a better option, or a better 
> option for certain settings.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to