[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16354758#comment-16354758
]
Jungtaek Lim edited comment on STORM-2937 at 2/7/18 12:05 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
That is just a sequence of steps I did which I feel very handy to do, but
someone may have concerns with my assumptions and makes the steps guaranteeing
more correctness but less handy.
For me, any sequence of steps would be fine for me, once we confirm that
storm-kafka-client/storm-kafka-client-example are copied correctly, and tests
are succeed.
was (Author: kabhwan):
That is just a sequence of steps I did which I feel very handy to do, but
someone may have concerns with my assumptions and make the steps guaranteeing
more correctness but less handy.
For me, any sequence of steps would be fine for me, once we confirm that
storm-kafka-client/storm-kafka-client-example are copied correctly, and tests
are succeed.
> Overwrite storm-kafka-client 1.x-branch into 1.0.x-branch
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: STORM-2937
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2937
> Project: Apache Storm
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: storm-kafka-client
> Affects Versions: 1.0.6
> Reporter: Jungtaek Lim
> Assignee: Erik Weathers
> Priority: Blocker
>
> This is to track the effort of syncing up divergence between
> storm-kafka-client 1.x-branch and 1.0.x-branch so that critical fixes can be
> go in 1.0.x-branch as well.
> Note that it can modify storm-core as well (unlikely in a
> backwards-incompatible way but not 100% sure), so we should make a decision
> whether we allow the change in bugfix version line.
> Linking discussion thread:
> [https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0451fed132bb982b618d9e0780282a87554f1bc5747827599f276944@%3Cdev.storm.apache.org%3E]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
