[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16354814#comment-16354814
]
Jungtaek Lim edited comment on STORM-2937 at 2/7/18 1:04 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
[~erikdw]
{quote}The main difference in my strategy being that I plan to have a commit of
what was manually copied back without thought or changes, and then a separate
commit of what I did to fix these various issues.
{quote}
That also comes from difference of the standard of unit of commit between you
and me. I wouldn't accept commit which doesn't compile. Ideally I wouldn't
accept commit either which doesn't pass tests, but life is not easy. :) Your
commit list is even OK for me while reviewing, but if I have a chance to merge
whatever way I want, I might request squashing at the end to meet the standard
for me.
I think that can be sorted out in review phase with hearing others voices as
well. Please take any approach you feel convenient. Thanks again for taking up
hard work!
was (Author: kabhwan):
[~erikdw]
{quote}The main difference in my strategy being that I plan to have a commit of
what was manually copied back without thought or changes, and then a separate
commit of what I did to fix these various issues.
{quote}
That also comes from difference of the standard of unit of commit between you
and me. I wouldn't see commit which doesn't compile. Ideally I wouldn't see
commit either which doesn't pass tests, but life is not easy. :) Your commit
list is even OK for me while reviewing, but if I have a chance to merge
whatever way I want, I might request squashing at the end to meet the standard
for me.
I think that can be sorted out in review phase with hearing others voices as
well. Please take any approach you feel convenient. Thanks again for taking up
hard work!
> Overwrite storm-kafka-client 1.x-branch into 1.0.x-branch
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: STORM-2937
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2937
> Project: Apache Storm
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: storm-kafka-client
> Affects Versions: 1.0.6
> Reporter: Jungtaek Lim
> Assignee: Erik Weathers
> Priority: Blocker
>
> This is to track the effort of syncing up divergence between
> storm-kafka-client 1.x-branch and 1.0.x-branch so that critical fixes can be
> go in 1.0.x-branch as well.
> Note that it can modify storm-core as well (unlikely in a
> backwards-incompatible way but not 100% sure), so we should make a decision
> whether we allow the change in bugfix version line.
> Linking discussion thread:
> [https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0451fed132bb982b618d9e0780282a87554f1bc5747827599f276944@%3Cdev.storm.apache.org%3E]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)