[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14394058#comment-14394058
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TAJO-1506:
--------------------------------------

GitHub user ykrips opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/502

    TAJO-1506: WorkerConnectionInfo::id field may be not unique, but its 
uniqueness is assumed throughout codes.

    

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/ykrips/tajo TAJO-1506

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/502.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #502
    
----
commit 84273653c5fd57af573c1bf73d846c1c0abc8922
Author: Jihun Kang <[email protected]>
Date:   2015-04-03T04:45:18Z

    Initial Work

----


> WorkerConnectionInfo::id field may be not unique, but its uniqueness is 
> assumed throughout codes.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAJO-1506
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1506
>             Project: Tajo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: query master, worker
>            Reporter: Hyunsik Choi
>            Assignee: Jihun Kang
>             Fix For: 0.11.0
>
>
> WorkerConnectionInfo::id is a integer value. It is generated in Worker by a 
> hashCode as follows:
> {code}
> public WorkerConnectionInfo(String host, int peerRpcPort, int pullServerPort, 
> int clientPort,
>                               int queryMasterPort, int httpInfoPort) {
> ...
>     this.queryMasterPort = queryMasterPort;
>     this.httpInfoPort = httpInfoPort;
>     this.id = hashCode();
> {code}
> Fundamentally, it uses hashCode method, so there are possibility to cause 
> duplicate integer value. But, all codes assume its uniqueness. It is a 
> potential problem.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to