[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15006757#comment-15006757
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TAJO-1946:
--------------------------------------

Github user jihoonson commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/839#discussion_r44934021
  
    --- Diff: 
tajo-plan/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/plan/logical/DistinctGroupbyNode.java 
---
    @@ -56,21 +57,21 @@ public DistinctGroupbyNode(int pid) {
     
       @Override
       public boolean hasTargets() {
    -    return targets.length > 0;
    +    return !targets.isEmpty();
    --- End diff --
    
    This code involves a potential NPE.


> Change Projectable::setTargets and getTargets to set and get List<Target>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAJO-1946
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1946
>             Project: Tajo
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Planner/Optimizer
>            Reporter: Hyunsik Choi
>            Assignee: Dongkyu Hwangbo
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: newbie
>
> See TAJO-1938. It would simplify lots of codes for 'for-loop' on Targets if 
> we change {{Projectable::setTargets}} and {{getTargets}} to set and get 
> {{List<Target>}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to