[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15253149#comment-15253149
]
Jihoon Son commented on TAJO-2130:
----------------------------------
Would you share why you think that we need to stop to support the inet4 type?
If we don't have yet, it makes sense to decide to not support it. However, even
though we already have yet, why do we need to remove it?
Is it the maintenance problem?
> Remove inet4 data type
> ----------------------
>
> Key: TAJO-2130
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2130
> Project: Tajo
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Hyunsik Choi
> Priority: Minor
>
> Inet4 data type is not necessary and is not used. It can be easily replaced
> by INT4 data type with some UDFs. Also, inet4 is overlapped with binary data
> types. Instead of keeping inet4, it would be better to improve binary data
> types.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
