[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15253578#comment-15253578
]
Hyunsik Choi commented on TAJO-2130:
------------------------------------
Yes, we should remove INET6 too. Actually, INET6 is not implemented except for
the constant value in TajoDataType.Type.
> Remove inet4 data type
> ----------------------
>
> Key: TAJO-2130
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2130
> Project: Tajo
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Hyunsik Choi
> Priority: Minor
>
> Inet4 data type is not necessary and is not used. It can be easily replaced
> by INT4 data type with some UDFs. Also, inet4 is overlapped with binary data
> types. Instead of keeping inet4, it would be better to improve binary data
> types.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
