Hi Oswald,

thank you for the fast reply.

My email was meant to be more of a means of collecting information about 
the current status of your project rather than forcing you to adapt your 
code to our changes.
If you are open to patches for alternative backends then that is good 
news for me.

Thanks,
Petr

On 07/24/2016 10:59 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 08:32:40AM +0200, Petr Kubat wrote:
>> with the license of Berkeley DB version 6 having changed to a more
>> restrictive AGPL license, which is legally incompatible with most of the
>> projects currently using BDB, Fedora's long term goal is to get rid of
>> BDB completely. As isync is one of the projects still dependent on BDB
>> in Fedora, I would like to ask you about the status of BDB in the project.
>>
>> Do you currently have any plans to migrate to/provide compatibility with
>> a different DB given the license change or will you be staying with an
>> older BDB version for the time being?
>>
> and given that i'm not providing binaries, i'd say upstream is not
> directly affected by this change. whether packagers choose to enforce
> older bdb versions or contribute patches to support alternative db
> backends is their choice (hint hint).


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are 
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, 
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning
reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
_______________________________________________
isync-devel mailing list
isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel

Reply via email to