Hello Reimar
On 07/31/2016 05:50 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 08:32:40AM +0200, Petr Kubat wrote: >> Do you currently have any plans to migrate to/provide compatibility with >> a different DB given the license change or will you be staying with an >> older BDB version for the time being? > I'd like to mention that not long ago I made bdb an optional dependency, > and anyone using maildir format like me doesn't need it. > So distributions could just drop support for it, and optionally > provide the mdconvert utility (which will need bdb) for anyone > using the format requiring bdb. > I am not sure if there is any value except backward compatibility > to the code using bdb? Because if not, any development effort > for supporting something else would be a complete waste of time. > (If you use it, now would be a good moment to shout and mention > its relevance to you I guess) > > Regards, > Reimar Döffinger Thank you for pointing out BDB is an optional dependency. As isync can be used without BDB through mdconvert if needed, it would make sense to just provide this solution. Petr ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
