On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 3:07 PM Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenha...@gmx.de> wrote: > i never really liked it anyway once i started to think about it > (obviously, quite a while after i introduced it ...), because it > suggests a strict hierarchy that isn't really there, as bi-directional > synchronization is supported. > the problem is that this equally applies to many potential replacements, > like 'replica'. maybe 'clone' is better, as it's more easily associated > with having its own life, and git already established the term. but what > to put opposite of it? 'origin' again suggests directionality quite > strongly.
Following the git analogy, "remote" and "local" could work. That shouldn't imply any hierarchy (although modern git usage with centralized source-of-truth repos may subvert that expectation). _______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
